Friday, April 30, 2010
Odd Man Out
Facing Ali: 15 Fighters 15 Stories
I’m not what you would call a boxing fan. As a matter of fact, I can’t tell you the last boxing match I watched. I don’t know who the current heavy weight champion is or if once, big name boxers like Oscar De La Hoya and Lennox Lewis still fight.
But there is something I enjoy immensely about old time boxing, a time when battles were fought hundreds, if not thousands, of miles away from places like the MGM Grand or Caesars Palace.
I’m talking years before George Foreman started making countertop grills and Iron Mike Tyson started biting off his opponent’s ears.
There is a great nostalgia of the golden age of boxing and it is captured perfectly in “Facing Ali: 15 Fighters 15 Stories” by Stephen Brunt.
Everyone knows who Muhammad Ali is and the story behind him. How he was once known as an Olympic gold medalist and young up-and–comer from Louisville, Kentucky, named Cassius Clay who changed his name after joining the Nation of Islam.
This book takes you through an oral history of more than a bakers dozen of some of the best fights of Ali’s career, told through the eyes of the boxers who fought against him.
This unique perspective gave observations and assertions from many of the fighters whose careers were advanced because of their bouts with Ali. It goes beyond the ring and describes what life was like before and after boxers stepped into the ring to fight what many believe is the greatest heavyweight boxer of all time.
Some are bittersweet, rags to riches and back to rags stories. Others show how careers can take off after fighting Ali.
Oral history is one of my favorite ways to tell a story and this book does not disappoint. Brunt has mastered the art of storytelling through this genre, which is one of my personal favorites.
Allowing people to tell their unabridged side of the story and see it side-by-side with other people who witnessed the same event is one of the most honest ways of tell a story. No matter what happens, each person can see the same event from a different angle.
It’s amazing to believe how great of a story you can get when the main character of the book never utters a word (no pun intended).
I thought the book was interesting in the fact that it did not cover the Rumble in the Jungle, which to many is one of the greatest boxing matches of all time.
I also liked that the book is not overflowing with statistical information. Instead, Brunt’s visual description painted an extraordinarily vivid picture for the reader.
Mayweather Confidence
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Second book review
In early October 2001, Ted Williams' health was failing severely and he was dying. His dear friend, Dominic DiMaggio and his friend, Dick Flavin, a local television personality from his hometown in Massachusetts, decided to drive 1,300 miles from Massachusetts to Florida to him Williams. Their old teammate and friend, Johnny Pesky decided to make the trip with them, Bobby Doerr, the last of the four teammates could not make the trip because of his wife's failing health.
The book is set up as a trip down memory lane for DiMaggio and Pesky as they make their way down to Florida. It starts when they all broke into the minor leagues together in the late 1930s and early 1940s. They all either spent all or most of their careers playing for the Red Sox, something you hardly see nowadays, which is what makes their bond so special and why they all became lifelong friends.
All four of these guys had Hall of Fame caliber careers for the Red Sox and were the cornerstones of those great Red Sox teams of the 1940s. Ted Williams is the last player to hit .400 for a season. But this book is about a lot more than just what these guys did on the field. They were brothers, and had a bond that over 70 years, was never broken.
They all had different roles in their collective friendship, just as they did on the field. Williams was the big brother with the demonstrative personality, always looking out for "my guys," as he called them. DiMaggio was the intellectual of the group who always kept the cool head. Pesky, the son of Croatian immigrants, always had to prove himself because of his small stature, and never disappointed. Doerr was all business, showing up and taking care of his responsibilities, both on and off the field. This became even more evident as his wife's health began to fail.
What struck me about this book was the bond the guys had, it went way beyond baseball. They were best friends; they had something that you rarely see in modern-day ballplayers. It was not just about baseball, they kept each other in their hearts because of the bond they made during their careers. They traveled across the country to be with their dying brother during his final moments. Their bond went way beyond being teammates, they were family. This is not just a sports book, it is a book about four men who grew up on the baseball field together and are there for each other, on and off the field.
3 Nights in August (Book Review)
Run Amy Run
This story is about Amy Palmiero-Winters, a 37-year-old mother of two with an amputated leg.
Yeah, I know, another feel good piece but it's pretty incredible.
She is the first amputee to be named to the U.S. national team. Palmiero-Winters runs 24 hour marathons, and competes in all sorts of insane endurance races, like the Western States Endurance Run, 100 miles of trail running through the Sierra Nevada (she is the third amputee to qualify). In July, she will run the Badwater Ultramarathon, a 135-miler in California from Death Valley to Mount Whitney — spanning three mountain ranges — in temperatures reaching 130 degrees.
Props to this lady, and the others as well, but she only has one real leg. I can run about three whole miles with my two god-given legs before I want to go home and take a cold shower to cool off.
Thanks for the inspiration Ms. Amy Pamiero-Winters. Good luck.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/olympics/summer/track/2010-04-25-amputee-runner_N.htm
Mike Kennedy
Book Review
The book is full of interesting information, including the history of the game, important players, important coaches and how American football came to be what it is today.
This book explained information to me about general rules of football that I have picked up on by watching the game casually but never really understood completely.
One of the most helpful sections that Rodney Peete wrote was an explanation on how to determine what position players are playing in by their jerseys, body builds and their position in relation to the quarterback.
I did not know that the NFL Rule Book has all jersey numbers corresponding to positions so it’s easier for referees to tell if the player is eligible to have been active in the play (quarterbacks, punters and placekickers, for instance, must wear uniform numbers between 1 and 19.)
Rodney Peete talks about being married to an NFL player like it’s a completely commonplace occurrence, dedicating a large chunk of her book (including a complete chapter) to discussing what it’s like to worry about your husband getting sacked or losing a big game.
Robinson Peete uses the book to clear the air on some of her own personal problems with her husband’s career, which definitely distracts from the point of the book.
The book is written in a very conversational tone, but is sometimes too simplistic and often the author’s jokes can be hokey.
A lot of her advice is, “the more you watch, the more you’ll pick up on.” It’s kind of no-brainer advice, but with the way the book is written it’s definitely true. If you didn’t grow up with sports knowledge, there is a lot to digest in this book.
This is definitely a book you can skim for information if you have a question during the game, but it’s definitely not a book you can ingest all in one reading.
The use of diagrams is helpful and her breakdown of the history is short and simple to read.
Overall, this book is a nice reference piece, but it could have been cut down quite a bit if Rodney Peete didn’t try to cater to her audience so much.
The book has some interesting information and might be something to keep next to me while watching season games, but it definitely isn’t something that I would casually read for fun.
Book 2 Review
McCarthy was a twenty-sixth round draft pick in the 2002 MLB draft. Listening on a different phone, McCarthy's father negotiated a deal and the next day he was signing a contract with the Anaheim Angels for a thousand dollars - the league minimum. He was on his way to climbing the relentless tower that is professional baseball.
The locker room politics was one of the more interesting topics throughout the book. Apparently teams are racially divided by race. The Dominicans, and the Americans. This being one of the first lessons learned entering training camp. The chase for the big leagues turned the team game into an individualistic mindset. Routing against a teammate was not uncommon, no one really cared about winning or losing, and everyone despised the guy who was drafted ahead of them. In the height of the steroid years, when sluggers like Bonds and McGuire were breaking records, the temptation of steroids was a struggle.
Friendships were made as the minor league life was rough, 76 games in 80 days. McCarthy was surrounded by guys who were in their sixth years in the minors and contemplating retirement and some would go on to be All Stars. Some were angry with the lies they felt they were fed, and some couldn't let go of the fact they would never make it to the league.
McCarthy gave readers the perfect insight to the character of baseball. From training camp to the end of his career, he would play one in one full season with the Angels' single A team in Provo, Utah. He logged appearances in 15 games and walked more batters than he struck out, but what he took with him was an experience some of us would envy.
Book Review
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Mike Kennedy
Happy Days
Royals Bull-pin loses again!
KWho?
Stanley Cup Playoff drama
It's been very simple for Washington, when Alexander Ovechkin has been on, they win, if not, lose; it's that simple. When Ovechkin scores goals, the Capitals are the best in hockey. The story of this series for me has been Montreal goaltender Jaroslav Halak. This is proof that a hot goaltender can win a series almost single-handily in the playoff. How hot has he been? Halak has stopped 90 of 92 shots he has faced in the last two games.
An even more staggering statistic for me in this series is Washington's power play. They had the #1 ranked power play in the NHL during the regular season, in this series, 1-for-30. Simply put, 1-for-30 will not get it done any league on any planet, period. If the Caps want to win the Stanley Cup, first they must win a game 7 tonight. Then they need to figure out what made them successful enough to have the #1 ranked power play in the NHL. They won't win anything unless they figure that out.
Be on the lookout tonight, it will definitely be a thrilling game 7. Excitement as only the Stanley Cup playoffs can bring.
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Mike Kennedy
That is multi-tasking.
I never realized how many notes were involved with announcing, but I found it interesting that he chooses to use his own set-up rather than using the information from the SID.
Like many of the speakers we have heard this semester, Kennedy said he did not enjoy anchoring on the news desk, but did enjoy the creative writing and shooting aspects of television.
As I listened to Kennedy on the radio tonight, I noticed as the Shockers had exciting points to their games his voice would pick up momentum. If he hadn’t mentioned anything about it in the class conversation (saying he had to be cognizant of his voice so it didn’t sound sleepy, and to push himself to sound resonant and exciting), I would never have noticed it.
I thought some of the best advice Kennedy gave was that if you are going to write, or announce, to be true to your personality. He said if you’re not funny, don’t force it. If you’re not good at ad libbing, don’t try to push it.
I also was interested to find out what he had to say regarding the differences between an analyst and someone who does play-by-play.
I really liked that he was honest with people and that he tries to be honest with himself in that regard.
Ya, I am pumped about it!!!
Joe Drape
Mike Kennedy
Good Ole Boys' Club
Monday, April 26, 2010
Joe Drape
Drape had many interesting insights to offer to the class, but the thing that intrigued me the most was his discussions about writing his books.
The entire time I read “Our Boys” I wondered what the people in town thought about his portrayal. I wondered if he took notes to get quotes, and how that affected his writing.
It was interesting to hear that he had to duck around corners to write down information for his story, and also fascinating how he noticed part of the way into writing his book that there was something missing: Him. Amazingly, his publishers allowed him to put himself in the story, and that was one thing that made the book so intriguing.
Moving to Smith Center seems like it would be a huge leap, especially when you’re used to the hustle and bustle of New York. Drape’s anecdotes about his wife and her reactions to small-town Kansas were amusing. I imagine I’d feel the same way if I walked into town and saw literally nobody on the street.
I wonder how he feels about leaving his family behind to travel the world for stories. I wonder how much of his time is devoted to travel, and how much he gets to choose where he will go.
His insights on writing were thought-provoking. He really understands that telling a sports great story isn’t always about the sport; often it’s about the emotion, the inner turmoil, the drama.
I think it’s fantastic how he’s stayed involved with Smith Center, still keeping up with people in town and the games. It shows a writer who is truly passionate about his work.
TV panel
The three all talked about how great certain aspects of the job are, but it really struck me that Haertl and Kobbe seemed so uninterested in learning Internet, social media, videos, anything. It seems like these two are so comfortable, probably because of their years of experience in the business, that they are really not too worried about losing their jobs to younger people who really know the business.
Frye struck me as a really good example for future broadcasters: He knows his stuff, he can do the one-man-band thing, he knows how hard the job is and he understands where the industry is going. He knows that as things change he is going to see some serious changes in his job, but he’s not really worried about that.
Overall, the three talked about a dilution of a product that I think the news industry as a whole is beginning to see. Content is less important than filling the segment to most news stations, and they are beginning to shy away from trying new things to keep people interested.
One thing the three all seemed to agree on is that passion will be your driving force. Haertl said it best: There is no 40 hour work week in TV. He said the job and profession will consume you (boy, that sounds great).
Overall in the sports cast, I appreciate Channel 12’s coverage more than anyone else’s. It could be just because I have an affinity for Channel 12 all around. Kake seems too hokey, and KSN just tends to bore me. KWCH is professional with good writers and good storytelling.
What’s with all the assistant basketball coaches leaving?
Strangely enough The Eagle covered Grant’s new position but said nothing about Barr. The only real mention of her leaving is on GoShockers.com. I can imagine Marshall may be difficult to deal with, but I’m not sure about Adams. She is tough on her team, but she seems to be an upbeat coach who would offer lots of input.
Does both assistant coaches leaving speak to something about the WSU basketball program, or does it simply mean that both are moving on to bigger and better things? I’d say probably the latter, but I could be wrong.
I also find it to be very strange that the Eagle doesn’t cover her leaving, but has already written two stories about Grant. We all know women’s basketball doesn’t have the pull that men’s basketball does, but it still seems like a pretty big change for coaching staff. Seems like something that Suellentrop would have picked up on.
Things that make you go, “huh.”
Coincidence?
It sounds to me like maybe Grant recruited Manigualt, who spent his time on the bench this season but was one of WSU’s most promising freshman players. It will be interesting to see if Manigualt, who has so far only said he is leaving for personal reasons, will try to play ball elsewhere.
A post on Manigualt’s Facebook wall says he is transferring, but comments to his friends say he is not sure where. This doesn’t sound like he’s terribly sure he wants to be closer to home, necessarily. It sounds more to me like he doesn’t want to sit on the bench at WSU, and understands his ability to get some play time.
Someone outright asked him if he is going to Clemson with Grant, to which he replied that he is not sure where he is going. It should be interesting to see how this story unfolds.
LFL execs truly unsportsmanlike
The Lingerie Football League has put two of its star players on probation — for wearing too much clothing.
The LFL features underwear-clad women playing 7-on-7 “football.”
Well, The New Times recently did an article on two of the team’s players, two of their top performers in fact, and a photo shoot of the women apparently did not agree with the LFL execs. Normally the women wear satin panties and bras for their photo shoots, but in this particular shoot they sported shoulder pads and Nike wristbands. Now they’re on probation.
Apparently these women are valued more for their modeling abilities than their athletic skills, and anything that may make them seem less like sex symbols and more like credible players is frowned upon.
Now I’m not saying that these women are by any means top athletes; they basically play touch football and are more spectacles for men’s amusement — about as much as mud wrestling — than they are treasured for their sporty natures.
But it’s still a pretty harsh punishment by league executives, and should send a clear message to the players that they are little more than money-makers and rump shakers for the league.
A quick photo search on the league will prove exactly that. The league is focused on tight ends, and not in the way football really should be.
You Had To Be There
Meat Market (Book 2 Review)
School is getting in the way of my obsession.
Joe Drape
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Reaction to Joe Drape
Saturday, April 24, 2010
Mike Kennedy
Friday, April 23, 2010
You had better not be talking camera man!
I have ironically working on this blog all week, and it all came to a head last night at Wichita Heights in the girls soccer game between Heights and Kapaun. After spending the last week doing my best to stick up for the brave men and women who officiate games, I couldn’t believe my ears last night.
Alright, now gather round. It’s story time!
From the time I arrived at Heights, the only words out of my mouth were, “I’ll take a hamburger, thanks,” at the concession stand during halftime.
So you can imagine my surprise in the middle of the second half when a linesman passed me running down the field and said, “You had better not be talking camera man! One more word and you are leaving!”
“Huh?”
“Did you say something?!”
“No.”
This exchange was followed by a smug look on his face that nonverbally said, “Just give me a reason pal. I heard what you said.”
Now, I have no way of knowing what he thought he heard me say. It was about the same time a fan in the stands behind me made a crack comparing the referee’s white beard to Santa Claus. Maybe that was it.
I don’t know.
The reason I got into sports writing is that I love competition. Every time I go to a game, I am hoping to see a close, competitive contest. And the Heights 3-2 win over Kapaun was a great game.
But believe me when I say that I really have no rooting interest in the outcome of a game as far as who wins.
The unbelievable assumption by this linesman, was not only was I going for one team over the other, but that I was emotionally invested enough to be yelling at a referee.
I tried to talk to the linesman after the game in an attempt to get to the bottom of what happened. But he bolted instantly and I didn’t get the chance.
The following is what I had been working on all week leading up to this incident. It is not something taken away from one game, but my observations over the course of three years of covering sports.
In the last three years of covering all types of sports in every season, I can count on one hand the number of outcomes that weren’t, “the ref’s fault.”
I cringe to think of the trillions of people who have spent the entire drive home furiously, red in the face, veins throbbing, blaming the result on an, “incompetent,” referee.
There comes a time when a ref owes an official explanation of a decision they have made. And believe it or not, there is a person designated to demand that explanation; the head coach.
Not the players, not the student section, not dad, not mom, especially not the camera man, and not anyone but the one and only head coach. If you are not the head coach, settle down a little bit.
One of my favorite things to see is both sides of a venue mercilessly voicing displeasure over the way a game is called. I am standing on one sideline, so I can only hear that side clearly.
But when the far side screams something at an official, the near side will scoff at how foolish those idiots over there are, right before taking a deep breath and pulling the trigger on an equally absurd statement.
Believe me. You sound exactly like those folks on the other side. You aren’t any more holy, or clever.
Take it from a truly impartial observer, you sound ridiculous when you let the ref have it. And by, “it,” I mean one of a million clichés.
One of the best ref clichés is, “Call It Both Ways.” I get what it means when you break down the English. It is a call for consistency. And because being judged as consistent is the highest praise an official can receive, to be inconsistent must be the biggest putdown.
The problem is, “Call It Both Ways,” has been used so much that it has completely lost all of its meaning. It is simply a vibrating pocket of air. The public release of this phrase should be considered as socially unacceptable as the public release of a similar pocket of air from the other end of the human body.
To give you an idea of how much brain activity that goes into, “Call It Both Ways,” I can, and will always, be able to point to this year’s 5A state championship basketball tournament in Topeka. After hearing a fan say, “Call It Both Ways,” for the 734th time, my curiosity got the better of me. I gathered all my strength and strained to make the tremendous effort it took to shift my gaze to the scoreboard.
The call in question evened up the team fouls at 5-5.
“Call It Both Ways,” indeed.
Another of these clichés is, “How Much Are They Paying You.” This one can take many different forms, but the implication here is that one team or the other has paid off an official in order to get them to throw the game.
Because, even in these hard times, nothing is more lucrative than putting on a striped shirt and fixing high school sporting events.
Exactly how do these transactions go down? Is there a secret exchange of briefcases? Maybe it takes place in a secret mowed clearing in the middle of a wheat field. Are there codes and secret handshakes?
Perhaps there is an underground bidding war before the season starts in a bunker underneath a football field somewhere. I wonder what kinds of precautions are taken to ensure no one is tailed.
Or, are you trying to say that a coach or athletic director has slipped an official a five, 10, or even 20 dollar bill just before the game?
Just right out in the light of day?
I know you are risking your ability to ever officiate again, but here’s 10 bucks. Go get yourself a nice cheeseburger after the game.
Then there is the good old, “What Game Are You Watching.” If the referees are in possession of technology that allows them to be secretly watching TV from the inside of their glasses or contact lenses, I want it! If they are unwilling to share it with me, the least they could do is give me some score updates.
Come on guys, a little common courtesy.
They could be listening to another game on the radio through an ear bud with the wires strategically hidden underneath the striped shirts.
But that wouldn’t be watching another game at all would it. And besides, AM reception inside a gym is tough to come by.
How about keeping it simple with a, “You Have Got To Be Kidding Me.”
Ah ha ha! You should see the look on your face! I got you good! No, but really, there is no foul on the play. I was just razzing you.
Let the game be the game. If a call doesn’t go your way, it is up to the players to pick themselves up and take it out of the official’s hands.
A class I wouldn't have missed
It was hard to decide which part of today’s class was my favorite.
It could have been Bruce Haertl calling Jim Kobbe “Cobra” all today. Or the fact that 2/3 of the group said they couldn’t even turn on a camera, let alone edit video, which is pretty funny when we live in a world full of one-man-band reporters.
Either way, it was an incredibly entertaining to have three local TV sportscasters in class.
I had no desire to be one television or on radio, and I still don’t after listening to Chris Frye, Haertl and Cobra.
Obviously being on TV has its perks, mainly the paycheck. But I’d rather take my lowly wage at the reporter’s desk than get up in front of the camera or behind the mic.
On a more serious note, there was something Haertl said that really hit home to me. He said the product his news station put out was more watered down than it used to be.
Heartl and Kobbe both mentioned that their 30-something producers cared about filling space, and that the quality of the content was less important than the valuable seconds of airtime it occupied.
It wasn’t the story that mattered. It was the 1:25 seconds that is took up.
I agree with them completely. As a newspaper editor, I sometimes have that mentality. There are times when I see a story as 12 inches on page two, rather than something insightful that a reader might like.
It becomes less about the content and more about the physical space the words occupy.
I’m not saying that’s a good thing, but it does happen, apparently on more than one level and in more than one medium.
Joe Drape captures small town Kansas
It’s not everyday I enjoy reading a required book for class. Actually, it’s not everyday I read a required book for class.
But, Joe Drape’s book “Our Boys: A Perfect Season on the Plains with the Smith Center Redmen” was an exception to the rule.
Drape, who is also a New York Times reporter, painted a perfect picture of what it’s like to play high school football in America’s Heartland.
I think the main reason I enjoyed Drape’s book so much was the fact that it had little to do with high school football (which I really don’t care all that much about) and more about small town, Kansas living.
I grew up in a small Kansas town, like Smith Center. We had an incredibly popular and successful 2A football team, like Smith Center.
Don’t get me wrong, we didn’t score a record 72 points in one quarter, or win almost every game we played, but there were a lot of similarities.
Drape’s thorough writing and attention to detail gave a flawless depiction of it was like to not only play football, but also grow up in a rural American.
Reading his book immediately brought me back to a place where things are a lot simpler and time moves a lot slower. It truly reminded me of my days in high school, where coaches strived to make young boys men, and maybe win a championship as well.
Drape’s book was a spot-on portrait of small town Kansas living.